Your comment is worth more than 2 cents
| This is a "Gravatar enabled" site. You can go to Gravatar.com and sign up for your own. All sites that use this service will then show your beautiful new likeness. Oh, and comments are moderated due to incessant spammer activity. |
the ugly fella needs a good meal!
I <3 the Stones. Seriously. They don’t take themselves too seriously and their fun and sexy and lettin’ all hang out all rolled into one.
Of course, I always get Mick confused with Steve Tyler too, so, what the fuck do I know?
Mick Jagger, definitely sexy! Even now, age aside, and I LOVE some of his pics when he was really young.
Keith Richards? GROSS!
All the Stones are TOO damn skinny, but at least they aren’t paunchy, or bald. I wonder about hair pieces?
Micks voice, beautiful? Maybe not. But it is unusual and he CAN sing on key. There are some songs where it actually is quite a nice voice. And he can still dance and strut at his age. That’s part of his overall “thing”.
Not to mention his prolific song writing ability.
It’s an overall “it” factor, and of course some talent or unique-ness, that makes a person a star in the first place, let alone many years.
I saw them in concert a year ago and if you didn’t look closely at the lines on their faces there was no difference in how they performed when they were barely in their 20’s. So it’s been FORTY years.
Amazing.
I liked most of the Stones’ songs, but never, NEVER thought they were sexy. I don’t think big fat lips are sexy either, not even on Angelina.
The Stones? Not sexy AT ALL, but I like the music. As far as screechy voices go, for me it’s AC/DC and the Smashing Pumpkins. The music behind both is great, but I can’t stand the singing!!!
I give them longevity and good song writing but that’s where it ends for me. All of their good songs I’ve liked better when other people sing them...aka Wild Horses.
Whenever Mick is dancing like a chicken I either was to start laughing or hurl.
Robin | 03.26.2007 | 8:46 AM